Content-level diffs, three-way merge, and blame stay in libgit2 rather than being reimplemented in SQL, since libgit2 already has that support and works against the Postgres backends through cgo bindings. The Forgejo fork would be “replace modules/git with libgit2 backed by Postgres” rather than “replace modules/git with raw SQL,” because the read-side queries only cover the simple cases and anything involving content comparison or graph algorithms still needs libgit2 doing the work with Postgres as its storage layer. That’s a meaningful dependency to carry, though libgit2 is well-maintained and already used in production by the Rust ecosystem and various GUI clients. SQL implementations of some of this using recursive CTEs would be interesting to try eventually but aren’t needed to get a working forge. The remaining missing piece is the server-side pack protocol: the remote helper covers the client side, but a Forgejo integration also needs a server that speaks upload-pack and receive-pack against Postgres, either through libgit2’s transport layer or a Go implementation that queries the objects table directly.
这是一个没有霸主的战场，但正因为没有霸主，留给后来者的空间比大模型赛道大得多。不过，如果你以为AI的机会只在这些数字世界里，那你可能错过了a16z今年押注里最出人意料的一个方向。
，推荐阅读im钱包官方下载获取更多信息
Online Safety Bill，这一点在爱思助手下载最新版本中也有详细论述
Israel's defense minister says his country has attacked Iran and declares a state of emergency
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27